[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Duplication of vdso and vsyscall code?
On 10/09/09 21:14, Andi Kleen wrote:
> One is at a fixed position in the user address space, and the other at a
> randomized position. The fixed one came first. Fixed doesn't know
> where randomized is. Randomized is also compiled and linked completely
> differently.
Is the fixed vsyscall stuff now considered to be legacy? As far as I
can see, the vdso seems to be what ends up being used on all the systems
I've tried (going back to Fedora 8).

> In theory the randomized one could call the fixed one, but
> originally there were some thoughts about turning off fixed for some
> applications that don't need it and also the path was considered very
> performance critical, so unneeded jumps were avoided.

rdtsc seems to swamp pretty much everything else. In my measurements it
alone takes 1/3 of the time. Though that's Core2; AMD have
traditionally been much better at those kinds of things.

> In theory you could probably #include the code from a common file, but it
> wouldn't buy you too much.

Yes, that's what I had in mind. I don't think duplicating the
instructions is all that important, but having two separate similarish
pieces of code seems like a maintenance headache. I only discovered the
second set of code by accident; I'd assumed that once I'd found one
vgettimeofday I'd found them all (and I'd been assuming that
clock_gettime didn't get the same treatment).

I'll see what happens if I try unifying them...


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-10 06:55    [W:0.035 / U:4.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site