Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:07:59 -0500 (EST) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact |
| |
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > > > Does gcc actually follow the "promise"? If that's the case (and if it's > > considered a bug when it doesn't), then we can get what Linus wants by > > annotating EVERY function with either __always_inline or noinline. > > > > __always_inline and noinline does work.
I vote for the, get rid of the current inline, rename __always_inline to inline, and then remove all non needed inlines from the kernel.
We'll, probably start adding a lot more noinlines.
-- Steve
| |