[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [REGRESSION] Recent change to kernel spikes out ccache/distcc
>>> Al Viro <> 07.01.09 06:10 >>>
>On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:15:26AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> Or, if that's too complicated, maybe it would be worthwhile to have
>> kbuild create its own specialized ccache system? Note that the last two
>> solutions rule out using distcc, unless we can encapsulate the build
>> process from a series of Makefile macros to a shell or C program, which
>> could then be injected to the remote host system to be executed by
>> distcc. One value of doing that is the CRC or MD5 of the shell script
>> could be used as the version tag for the cache system.
>Ho-hum... Could somebody explain why the hell had we switched to this
>"intermediate .s" approach, anyway? It's not as if we couldn't run
>objcopy after what we used to do...

Because objcopy wouldn't remove the __crc_* symbols the way the
object files were generated previously. I explored all possibilities I could
think of, with that two step process being the last, but the only one that
had the intended effect. In the end I queried the binutils list, and got
confirmation that there's no (existing) way to get rid of symbols used in
relocations in an already existing object file without corrupting it.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-07 09:51    [W:0.176 / U:3.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site