[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -v4][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning

On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Chris Mason wrote:
> So far I haven't found any btrfs benchmarks where this is slower than
> mutexes without any spinning. But, it isn't quite as fast as the btrfs
> spin.

Quite frankly, from our history with ext3 and other filesystems, using a
mutex in the filesystem is generally the wrong thing to do anyway.

Are you sure you can't just use a spinlock, and just release it over IO?
The "have to do IO or extend the btree" case is usually pretty damn clear.

Because it really sounds like you're lock-limited, and you should just try
to clean it up. A pure "just spinlock" in the hotpath is always going to
be better.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-07 18:55    [W:0.274 / U:2.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site