[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2.6.28-rc7] regulator: catch some registration errors
On Thursday 04 December 2008, Mark Brown wrote:
> [ Re Liam's comments about those non-existent cpufreq+regulator drivers ]
> On the bright side, looking at the situation with the clock API there
> don't seem to be any other substantial offenders here.  Most of the
> other users are part of the platform code and get to peer inside the
> clocking structure, so if cpufreq were fixed there shouldn't be much
> problem here.

Last time I looked, no cpufreq driver tried to use <linux/clk.h>
calls. The reason was simple: the clock framework code sits in
DRAM, so it can't be executed while changing DRAM clocks.

Those bits of cpufreq had to live in on-chip SRAM (there's usually
a few pages of it) and directly update PLL and other clock config
registers ... then wait for things to stabilize before they returned
and the CPU executed from DRAM again.

- Dave

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-06 01:17    [W:0.108 / U:2.604 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site