[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: document ext3 requirements
On Sun 2009-01-04 18:35:41, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> [CC: Alan Cox because of his reply in the "XFS internal error" thread]
>> Using ext3 is only safe if storage subsystem meets certain
>> criteria. Document those.
> Thanks for this patch. However, after reading this, I have a stupid
> question: which file system should I use if I had to reinstall my
> computers from scratch now?

ext2 is still the safest default... if you can live with fsck.

ext3 is the safest from the journalling ones, AFAICT.
(cesky, pictures)

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-04 21:11    [W:0.235 / U:9.764 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site