lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PULL] cpumask tree

* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> Once we have figured out the CPU-hotplug lockdep splat (possibly due
> >>> to Mike's changes not yours) i'll send it to Linus. Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Ingo
> >> Thanks! Am working on that now.
> >
> > do you suspect any of the commits? I'm bisecting it right now but if you
> > have bisected it already i wont repeat it.
> >
> > Ingo
>
> I haven't done that yet, I'm just now getting your config to work pre-patches.
>
> But yes, I suspect one of the changes to use "work_on_cpu" -- this
> usually causes the 2nd call to get_online_cpus().

i suspect it's:

| commit 2d22bd5e74519854458ad372a89006e65f45e628
| Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
| Date: Wed Dec 31 18:08:46 2008 -0800
|
| x86: cleanup remaining cpumask_t code in microcode_core.c

as the microcode is loaded during CPU onlining.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-03 16:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans