Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:47:33 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PULL] cpumask tree |
| |
* Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote: > > > >>> Once we have figured out the CPU-hotplug lockdep splat (possibly due > >>> to Mike's changes not yours) i'll send it to Linus. Thanks, > >>> > >>> Ingo > >> Thanks! Am working on that now. > > > > do you suspect any of the commits? I'm bisecting it right now but if you > > have bisected it already i wont repeat it. > > > > Ingo > > I haven't done that yet, I'm just now getting your config to work pre-patches. > > But yes, I suspect one of the changes to use "work_on_cpu" -- this > usually causes the 2nd call to get_online_cpus().
i suspect it's:
| commit 2d22bd5e74519854458ad372a89006e65f45e628 | Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> | Date: Wed Dec 31 18:08:46 2008 -0800 | | x86: cleanup remaining cpumask_t code in microcode_core.c
as the microcode is loaded during CPU onlining.
Ingo
| |