lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PULL] cpumask tree

    * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:

    > Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
    > >
    > >>> Once we have figured out the CPU-hotplug lockdep splat (possibly due
    > >>> to Mike's changes not yours) i'll send it to Linus. Thanks,
    > >>>
    > >>> Ingo
    > >> Thanks! Am working on that now.
    > >
    > > do you suspect any of the commits? I'm bisecting it right now but if you
    > > have bisected it already i wont repeat it.
    > >
    > > Ingo
    >
    > I haven't done that yet, I'm just now getting your config to work pre-patches.
    >
    > But yes, I suspect one of the changes to use "work_on_cpu" -- this
    > usually causes the 2nd call to get_online_cpus().

    i suspect it's:

    | commit 2d22bd5e74519854458ad372a89006e65f45e628
    | Author: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
    | Date: Wed Dec 31 18:08:46 2008 -0800
    |
    | x86: cleanup remaining cpumask_t code in microcode_core.c

    as the microcode is loaded during CPU onlining.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-03 16:51    [W:0.034 / U:31.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site