[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:52:13AM +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> Putting that into shinfo should work fine. I thought extending that
> structure with information that isn't needed for all packets was as bad
> as extending sk_buff itself. If that isn't the case, then extending
> shinfo definitely is the simplest solution.

Not at all, the sk_buff has its own slab while skb->head uses
kmalloc. The latter has loads of free space due to padding for
common MTUs such as 1500 or header-only.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-28 10:57    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean