[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
Harvey Harrison wrote:
> For now, the problem is with arches like X86 that need to test the availability of
> an instruction. So the arch versions could be unconditionally offered on X86_64
> and the lowest-common denominator (no BSWAP) on X86-32. If we still want the
> optimized (BSWAP) versions on X86-32 the tests will have to use the compiler arch flags
> as opposed to CONFIG_BSWAP....which is probably not worth the trouble.

Well, that's how the headers were originally written, I believe.

CONFIG_BSWAP can be replaced with the __i486__ macro, and since most
distros compile for i586 or i686 these days, it might actually make
sense for this one particular case.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-28 22:29    [W:0.101 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site