[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
    Harvey Harrison wrote:
    > For now, the problem is with arches like X86 that need to test the availability of
    > an instruction. So the arch versions could be unconditionally offered on X86_64
    > and the lowest-common denominator (no BSWAP) on X86-32. If we still want the
    > optimized (BSWAP) versions on X86-32 the tests will have to use the compiler arch flags
    > as opposed to CONFIG_BSWAP....which is probably not worth the trouble.

    Well, that's how the headers were originally written, I believe.

    CONFIG_BSWAP can be replaced with the __i486__ macro, and since most
    distros compile for i586 or i686 these days, it might actually make
    sense for this one particular case.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-28 22:29    [W:0.027 / U:7.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site