[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH, RFC] Remove fasync() BKL usage, take 3325
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:23:37 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <> wrote:

> But please don't forget it is not strictly necessary f_op->fasync()
> must use fasync_helper(). And we have users (pipe_rdwr_fasync) which
> call fasync_helper() twice.

Understood. Any such change will certainly require an audit of all
in-tree fasync() implementations; that's part of why it's taking a
little while. But it also cleans things up and solves the atomicity
problems nicely, so I think it's worth trying.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-28 15:17    [W:0.070 / U:2.040 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site