[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Do you think the "fix headers_check" patches spend lots of time analyzing
> things? I bet no. They just try to make the warning go away, so you don't
> actually end up with any more "coverage" anyway. Quite the reverse -
> instead of having a simple rule ("CONFIG_xyz options simply do not exist
> in user space"), you end up having ad-hoc hacks on a per-fix basis.

This is probably true. I think we should add this as one more of the
preprocessing rules which we really should just do, as well as automatic
mangling of integer types.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-28 01:15    [W:0.086 / U:0.824 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site