[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [: [git pull] headers_check fixes]
    Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > Do you think the "fix headers_check" patches spend lots of time analyzing
    > things? I bet no. They just try to make the warning go away, so you don't
    > actually end up with any more "coverage" anyway. Quite the reverse -
    > instead of having a simple rule ("CONFIG_xyz options simply do not exist
    > in user space"), you end up having ad-hoc hacks on a per-fix basis.

    This is probably true. I think we should add this as one more of the
    preprocessing rules which we really should just do, as well as automatic
    mangling of integer types.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-28 01:15    [W:0.019 / U:11.432 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site