Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:51:15 +0100 | From | Joerg Roedel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 09/16] dma-debug: add checking for map/unmap_page/single |
| |
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:17:19PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:28:27 +0100 > Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:17:32AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Monday 19 January 2009, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > > Impact: add debug callbacks for dma_{un}map_[page|single] > > > > > > In the discussion about "[PATCH] usb/mcs7830: Don't use buffers from > > > stack for USB transfers", I have raised the question of whether we can > > > add a check for the DMA address being on the stack, I guess this would > > > be the right place for it. > > > > > > Maybe you can add another check like: > > > > > > WARN_ON(is_kernel_stack(page_to_virt(page))); > > > > Good idea. This would be the right place for such a check. > > > > > Unfortunately, I can't think of a way to define a generic is_kernel_stack > > > function. On most architectures (all that put thread_info at the top of the > > > stack), something like this should work: > > > > > > #ifndef is_kernel_stack > > > static inline int is_kernel_stack(void *p) > > > { > > > return (unsigned long)p & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1) == current_thread_info(); > > > } > > > #endif > > > > Hmm, this function is indeed required on all architectures. If you send > > a patchset which adds it I will add the check for stack addresses to > > this debugging code :) > > object_is_on_stack()
Oh cool. This function exists already. Thanks for the hint :)
Joerg
| |