Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:25:06 -0500 (EST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] SLUB: revert direct page allocator pass through |
| |
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Christoph Lameter > <cl@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > It seems that we currently need the slab allocators to compensate for the > > performance problems in the page allocator for these higher order allocs. > > I'd rather have the page allocator fixed but things are as they are. > > So, is that an ACK or a NAK for the patch?-)
Doesnt that break down Nick's order-0 dominates-the-world scheme break down? One of the reasons for doing this was to get the page allocator performance issues exposed and addressed.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
| |