Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:44:23 +0100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator |
| |
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:34:49PM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > ... Would you be able to test with this updated patch > > (which also includes Hugh's fix ... > > In fact not: claim_remote_free_list() still has the offending unlocked > + VM_BUG_ON(!l->remote_free.list.head != !l->remote_free.list.tail);
Doh, thanks. Turned out to still miss a few cases where it wasn't checking for memoryless nodes (Andi explains why I didn't see it with x86-64: because it handles the case differently and assigns the default node to the nearest one with memory. I think).
Working on a new version, so I've definitely got your bug covered now :)
| |