[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
    Kevin Shanahan wrote:
    >>> --- ping statistics ---
    >>> 900 packets transmitted, 900 received, 0% packet loss, time 899326ms
    >>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.093/0.157/3.611/0.117 ms
    >>> So, a _huge_ difference. But what does it mean?
    >> It means, a scheduling problem. Can you run the latency tracer (which
    >> only works with realtime priority), so we can tell if it is (a) kvm
    >> failing to wake up the vcpu properly or (b) the scheduler delaying the
    >> vcpu from running.
    > Sorry, but are you sure that's going to be useful?
    > If it only works on realtime threads and I'm not seeing the problem when
    > running kvm with realtime priority, is this going to tell you what you
    > want to know?
    > Not trying to be difficult, but that just didn't make sense to me.

    You're right, wasn't thinking properly.

    This is a tough one. I'll see if I can think of something. Ingo, any

    error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-21 16:03    [W:0.033 / U:3.492 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site