lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] x86: make UV support configurable

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:

> Fixed the EFI omission since the last patch. I have not changed the
> Kconfig to include (what I think are) false dependencies (which really
> frustrate me when things get badly tangled up). If people want to test
> as much stuff as possible even that is not supported by their hardware,
> we have allyesconfig/allmodconfig. I don't think UV is particularly
> special in that respect (we allow Intel, AMD, etc CPUs to be configured
> out)
>
> If anything, X86_UV should *select* MAXSMP, rather than the other way
> around. That would be more logical, but even then I don't like adding
> still a false dep because one might have a small UV system, or want to
> test with different NR_CPUS.
>
> Anyway, I think this patch is good as-is. If someone wants to streamline
> config options with subsequent patches, that's great. If Ingo can be
> convinced of a better arrangement, fine.

Applied to tip/x86/uv, thanks Nick!

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-20 15:31    [W:0.053 / U:0.224 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site