Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:27:33 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [patch] x86: make UV support configurable |
| |
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> Fixed the EFI omission since the last patch. I have not changed the > Kconfig to include (what I think are) false dependencies (which really > frustrate me when things get badly tangled up). If people want to test > as much stuff as possible even that is not supported by their hardware, > we have allyesconfig/allmodconfig. I don't think UV is particularly > special in that respect (we allow Intel, AMD, etc CPUs to be configured > out) > > If anything, X86_UV should *select* MAXSMP, rather than the other way > around. That would be more logical, but even then I don't like adding > still a false dep because one might have a small UV system, or want to > test with different NR_CPUS. > > Anyway, I think this patch is good as-is. If someone wants to streamline > config options with subsequent patches, that's great. If Ingo can be > convinced of a better arrangement, fine.
Applied to tip/x86/uv, thanks Nick!
Ingo
| |