Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:24:31 -0800 | From | Mike Travis <> | Subject | Re: git-pull request for tip/cpus4096 |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ingo, >> >> Here's the latest cpumask updates which includes the latest merge from >> Rusty's cpumask tree. > > Pulled into tip/cpus4096, thanks Mike. > > Rusty already sent the pull request to Linus for his latest cpumask bits - > is it fine if that goes upstream first and we do the second phase of the > cpus4096 tree after that point?
As in the bits included in this pull request, or as in the last set of cpumask changes yet to be pushed to you? (Either is fine with me, just let me know what you want me to do.)
> > Also, while testing tip/master i noticed that a couple of architectures > wouldnt build due to cpumask changes: > > testing 21 architectures. > > testing cris: -git: pass ( 28), -tip: FAIL ( 25) > testing m32r: -git: pass ( 21), -tip: FAIL ( 31) > > both build failures go like this: > > /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c: In function 'find_last_bit': > /home/mingo/tip/lib/find_last_bit.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__fls' > make[2]: *** [lib/find_last_bit.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2 > > these architectures have no __fls() implementation ... > > trouble should be expected on ~8 architectures:
I'll leave this to Rusty, as it's his baby. (Is there an echo in here? ;-)
Thanks, Mike
> > for N in arch/*; do [ -d $N ] && ( printf "%-20s: " $N; cd $N; dgrep __fls | > wc -l; ); done | sort -t: -n -k +2 > > arch/cris : 0 > arch/frv : 0 > arch/h8300 : 0 > arch/m32r : 0 > arch/m68k : 0 > arch/mn10300 : 0 > arch/um : 0 > arch/xtensa : 0 > arch/arm : 1 > arch/avr32 : 1 > arch/blackfin : 1 > arch/ia64 : 1 > arch/m68knommu : 1 > arch/parisc : 1 > arch/powerpc : 1 > arch/s390 : 1 > arch/sh : 1 > arch/x86 : 1 > arch/alpha : 2 > arch/sparc : 2 > arch/mips : 5 > > Ingo
| |