On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 13:59 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 13:19 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Ouch, that doesn't look like it will be nice at all for interactivity. > > Actually, it's not as bad as expected, merely lethargic slug.
Right, just ran the thing on my laptop and sluggish but 'usable' at load >100 seems perfectly good to me.