lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: .29rc2 lockdep report. fb_mmap vs sys_mmap2
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 06:19:25PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> Two mmaps enter! Fight!
>
>
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.29-0.41.rc2.fc11.i686 #1
> -------------------------------------------------------
> plymouthd/669 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&fb_info->lock){--..}, at: [<c055355c>] fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c0406a5d>] sys_mmap2+0x44/0x7b
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){----}:
> [<c044fef3>] __lock_acquire+0x9af/0xb22
> [<c04500c1>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x81
> [<c048e036>] might_fault+0x60/0x80
> [<c053dedc>] copy_to_user+0x2c/0xfc
> [<c05542cc>] fb_ioctl+0x247/0x338
> [<c04b0c9f>] vfs_ioctl+0x22/0x69
> [<c04b1214>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x46a/0x4a3
> [<c04b128d>] sys_ioctl+0x40/0x5a
> [<c0403b76>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> -> #0 (&fb_info->lock){--..}:
> [<c044fdc8>] __lock_acquire+0x884/0xb22
> [<c04500c1>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x81
> [<c06e1b98>] __mutex_lock_common+0xd5/0x329
> [<c06e1e84>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2e/0x36
> [<c055355c>] fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
> [<c0494620>] mmap_region+0x22b/0x43c
> [<c0494aa2>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x271/0x2d1
> [<c0406a73>] sys_mmap2+0x5a/0x7b
> [<c0403b76>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> 1 lock held by plymouthd/669:
> #0: (&mm->mmap_sem){----}, at: [<c0406a5d>] sys_mmap2+0x44/0x7b
>
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 669, comm: plymouthd Not tainted 2.6.29-0.41.rc2.fc11.i686 #1
> Call Trace:
> [<c06e09b6>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
> [<c044f32d>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x5d/0x68
> [<c044fdc8>] __lock_acquire+0x884/0xb22
> [<c04500c1>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x81
> [<c055355c>] ? fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
> [<c06e1b98>] __mutex_lock_common+0xd5/0x329
> [<c055355c>] ? fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
> [<c06e1e84>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2e/0x36
> [<c055355c>] ? fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
> [<c055355c>] fb_mmap+0x87/0x156
> [<c0494620>] mmap_region+0x22b/0x43c
> [<c0494aa2>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x271/0x2d1
> [<c0406a73>] sys_mmap2+0x5a/0x7b
> [<c0403b76>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

I reported this one already some time ago [1], Andrea Righi [cc'd]
also had a fix [2] but it seemed to not have made it in. Andrea,
perhaps you can resend it?

Hannes

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/22/759
[2] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/377


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-18 03:01    [W:0.053 / U:0.296 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site