lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 42/94] [PATCH 11/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 01

    > 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
    >
    > ------------------
    >
    > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
    >
    > commit 58fd3aa288939d3097fa04505b25c2f5e6e144d1 upstream.
    >
    > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
    > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

    That does not make review exactly easy. Would it be possible to
    inline upstream comment in the commit message?

    ...upstream commit message is empty :-(.

    > -asmlinkage long
    > -sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp)
    > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct timespec __user *, rqtp,
    > + struct timespec __user *, rmtp)
    > {
    > struct timespec tu;
    >

    Is it strictly neccessary to modify all the syscalls?

    Pavel
    --
    (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
    (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-16 12:03    [W:0.023 / U:144.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site