Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:05:21 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc] regulator: add get_status() |
| |
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 07:35:29AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 15 January 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:
> > Please send a separate patch for the kerneldoc as I've already applied.
> So that will be the first member of "struct regulator_ops" to > grow kerneldoc ... out of a total of fifteen (now) members. > Hmm...
> Maybe I'm not understanding what's meant by "kerneldoc adding". > Perhaps it's nothing more than a sentence resembling "returns > REGULATOR_STATUS_* code or negative errno", and not real > kerneldoc?
No, real kerneldoc - this was added recently, check current mainline (eg, commit c8e7e4640facbe99d10a6e262523b25be129b9b9). I'm not saying it's great but it's there.
-- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
| |