lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic
Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 4:35:25 pm Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> Anyways heres what I'm trying to achieve:
>>
>> default looks like this:
>> Configured NetLabel domain mappings(1)
>> domain: DEFAULT
>> protocol: UNLABELED
>>
>> I want to try and have three of these for the
>> different types of media:
>> (in theory)
>> Configured NetLabel domain mappings(3)
>> domain:radio
>> protocol: UNLABELED
>> domain:T.V.
>> protocol: UNLABELED
>> domain:web
>> protocol: UNLABELED
>> (and if possible three different tags(either 1,2,5), but probably can
>> only do that with cipsov4);
>>
>
>
apologize for the slow response
(had to do some external activities);
> Actually, in your case you are probably always going to want to send
> network traffic without any labels attached to the packets (no labeled
> IPsec or CIPSO) so you can stick with the default domain mapping
> configuration which sends all packets "unlabeled". The part you should
> be concerned about is the static/fallback configuration which assigns
> network peer labels to packets which do not have labels attached to
> them by the remote host.
>
sure would be nice to use ipsec/cipsov4 with a internet radio.
(lock down that tcp line);
I'll have to look into making sure I have static/fallback
configured correctly.
> NOTE: the domain mapping configuration only controls how outbound
> network traffic is labeled on-the-wire; it "maps" the
> LSM/SELinux "domains" to a specific labeling protocol configuration,
> e.g. all apache_t traffic should be labeled with CIPSO DOI 3 while all
> firefox_t traffic should not be labeled at all.
>
>
>> heres what I've come up with so far:
>>
>> netlabelctl -p map del default
>>
>> netlabelctl unlbl add domain:radio interface:wlan0 address:<myadd>
>> label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>> netlabelctl unlbl add domain:radio interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd>
>> label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>>
>> netlabelctl unlbl add domain:T.V. interface:wlan0 address:<myadd>
>> label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>> netlabelctl unlbl add domain:T.V. interface:wlan0 address:<t.v.add>
>> label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>>
>
> I think what you mean to type is the following:
>
> # netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd> \
> label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>
> ... note there is no "domain" argument, that only exists
> for "netlabelctl map ..." commands.
>
> NOTE: if you really want to get fancy you can create new SELinux domains
> for each type of media and add NetLabel configurations for those new
> domains. Imagine you create a new "internet_radio_t" domain/type and
> only allow the "netplayer_t" domain (yeah, I made that up but you get
> the point) access to network traffic labeled with internet_radio_t.
> You would then use the following command to label your incoming traffic
> with NetLabel:
>
> # netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd> \
> label:system_u:object_r:internet_radio_t:s0
>
> NOTE: you can also skip the "interface:wlan0" argument and just
> use "default" instead if you want the configuration to apply to all
> your network interfaces; although bear in mind that the "default"
> configuration can be overridden by the interface specific
> configurations.
>
>
Alright, I thought you could use the map option for unlbl.

>> As for the new capabilities, I don't mind trying that out when
>> the time comes(but first I need to figure the this out before any
>> other ways);
>>
>
> No problem, I understand. Let me know if you have any more problems.
>
>
>> here is what the error looks like:
>>
>> netlabel_tools-0.19# make
>> INFO: creating the version header file
>> .: 10: version_info: not found
>> make: *** [include/version.h] Error 2
>>
>
> Huh, can you try the following:
>
> 1. Open the netlabel_tools-0.19/Makefile in your favorite editor
> 2. Change the ". version_info; \" line to "source ./version_info; \"
> 3. Save your changes
> 4. Try running "make" again
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Thanks for the info,
Ill try this right away and let you know
if the package compiles.

regards;

Justin P. Mattock


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-15 02:57    [W:1.756 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site