lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Subject[PATCH -tip] time-sched.c: tick_nohz_update_jiffies should be static
From
Date
Impact: cleanup, reduce kernel size a bit, avoid sparse warning

Fixes sparse warning:
kernel/time/tick-sched.c:137:6: warning: symbol 'tick_nohz_update_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 1b6c05b..d3f1ef4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ __setup("nohz=", setup_tick_nohz);
* value. We do this unconditionally on any cpu, as we don't know whether the
* cpu, which has the update task assigned is in a long sleep.
*/
-void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
+static void tick_nohz_update_jiffies(void)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
--
1.6.0.6




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-14 16:13    [W:0.027 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site