Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:13:30 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging) |
| |
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:58:42PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > There is not just the cifs md5 one (which has been around a long > time), but an md5_init (static) in crypto and the new one in rt. The > addition of the new one (rt md5_init) causes the build problem. It > would be nice if we could use the same md5 routines though ... last > time we checked the crypto one was not well suited for calculating > signatures as a network fs would do though.
I'll fix up the staging rt drivers to not do this, but cifs shouldn't be declaring such functions as globals either :)
thanks,
greg k-h
| |