[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage
David Miller wrote:
> From: Mike Travis <>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:49:46 -0800
>> Thanks for fixing it. In actuality though, it should return cpu_mask_all
>> instead of CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR but that's a small nit.
> CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is defined to &cpu_mask_all, that's why I used it, to
> be consistent with the other macro using CPU_MASK_ALL right above it.

It's not a big deal. CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is one of those "bandaids" to
keep current code working until it's all been cleansed of the old
cpumask_t functions. Rusty's so-called "big hammer" patch.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-11 23:31    [W:0.056 / U:2.172 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site