Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu) | Date | Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:48:31 +1030 |
| |
On Friday 09 January 2009 08:53:22 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > (Forward to Rusty) > > On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:23:55 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20090107: > > > > > > Undropped tree: > > > rr > > > > > > Dropped trees (temporarily): > > > ocfs2 (build problem) > > > cpu_alloc (build problem) > > > > > > When CONFIG_SMP=n, both arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h and > > include/asm-generic/percpu.h define both of > > read_percpu_ptr() and read_percpu_var().
Erk... this header is a bit of a mess of 64bit/32bit UP/SMP defines.
I've thwacked it harder, thanks! Rusty.
| |