Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Sep 2008 01:12:11 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] rate limit drm:radeon_cp_idle/reset errors |
| |
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:37:32 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <roppedisano@infracomspa.it> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:08:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 11:19:19 +0200 Roberto Oppedisano <roppedisano@infracomspa.it> wrote: > > > > > When switching from kwin composite wm (KDE 4.1) to compiz I often hit the > > > following error: > > > > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138203] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138568] [drm:radeon_cp_reset] *ERROR* radeon_cp_reset called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > > > > probably due to broken X drivers/apps; after hitting this the error my laptop > > > (hp nx7010) is totally unresponsitive to keyboard/mouse, also if it can be > > > shut down via the power button: > > > > > > Sep 6 10:24:59 poppero1 powersave-wm_shutdown[4843]: DIAG: Process script for event button.power ID 10 > > > Sep 6 10:24:59 poppero1 powersave-wm_shutdown[4843]: INFO: Event: BUTTON_POWER occured. > > > Sep 6 10:24:59 poppero1 powersave-wm_shutdown[4843]: INFO: Parameters: Event - button.power; Current Active Scheme: scheme_performance - ACPI event line: button/power PWRF 00000080 > > > 00000001 > > > Sep 6 10:25:00 poppero1 shutdown[4852]: shutting down for system halt > > > ... > > > > > > Without the attached patch, which rate limits DRM_ERROR, the syslog is flooded > > > by thuosands of messages; here's the output with the patch applied. > > > > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138774] [drm:radeon_cp_start] *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.138968] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.139214] [drm:radeon_cp_reset] *ERROR* radeon_cp_reset called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.139408] [drm:radeon_cp_start] *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.139601] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.139866] [drm:radeon_cp_reset] *ERROR* radeon_cp_reset called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.140072] [drm:radeon_cp_start] *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:31 poppero1 kernel: [ 186.140467] [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:36 poppero1 kernel: [ 191.139019] __ratelimit: 253431 callbacks suppressed > > > Sep 6 10:24:36 poppero1 kernel: [ 191.139030] [drm:radeon_cp_reset] *ERROR* radeon_cp_reset called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > Sep 6 10:24:36 poppero1 kernel: [ 191.139314] [drm:radeon_cp_start] *ERROR* radeon_cp_start called without lock held, held 0 owner f726bc80 f68f6840 > > > > > > Also if it doesn't solve a bug I think it may still be worth applying it. > > > Patch is against current git. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Oppedisano <roberto.oppedisano@infracom.it> > > > > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h > > > index 1c1b13e..1107361 100644 > > > --- a/include/drm/drmP.h > > > +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h > > > @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ struct drm_device; > > > * \param arg arguments > > > */ > > > #define DRM_ERROR(fmt, arg...) \ > > > - printk(KERN_ERR "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] *ERROR* " fmt , __func__ , ##arg) > > > + if (printk_ratelimit()) \ > > > + printk(KERN_ERR "[" DRM_NAME ":%s] *ERROR* " fmt , __func__ , ##arg) > > > > > > /** > > > * Memory error output. > > > > > > > Which kernel version(s)? > > This is against vanilla current git. > > Linux poppero1 2.6.27-rc5-00000-g7686ad5-dirty #1 PREEMPT Sun Sep 7 08:47:08 CEST 2008 i686 GNU/Linux >
Thanks. I should have asked earlier: was 2.6.26 OK? Any other kernels tested?
| |