* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:

> here is an another attempt to satisfy the requirements :)
> Please review and comment if it looks better or worse now.

sigh, i think the extra buffering is clearly worse. These are early init 
printks and we already do many other cases of multi-line printouts and 
even KERN_CONT printouts. We have a perfectly fine built-in buffer 
already: the printk buffer.

	Ingo