[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
    On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > >
    > > Adding another check after the second get_cycles() makes it reliable:
    > My original patch actually had that, and Ingo added it to the -tip tree
    > too (I think), so that should be the one we're discussing anyway. I just
    > didn't think it would ever trigger in practice, which is why I removed it.
    > Mea culpa.

    My bad. Did not test that against -tip, just applied it from mail :)

    Just checked. The -tip version still has the expect-- in the for()
    which might lead to stupid results depending on the gcc madness level.



     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-06 22:41    [W:0.021 / U:1.732 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site