[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Adding another check after the second get_cycles() makes it reliable:
> My original patch actually had that, and Ingo added it to the -tip tree
> too (I think), so that should be the one we're discussing anyway. I just
> didn't think it would ever trigger in practice, which is why I removed it.
> Mea culpa.

My bad. Did not test that against -tip, just applied it from mail :)

Just checked. The -tip version still has the expect-- in the for()
which might lead to stupid results depending on the gcc madness level.



 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-06 22:41    [W:0.107 / U:8.992 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site