lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] shrink printk timestamp field

* Joe Korty <joe.korty@ccur.com> wrote:

> >> Of course it's useful. If you're working on performance or latency
> >> in a disk, network or USB driver, microsecond resolution is about
> >> right.
> >
> > I second this. If we have timestamps enables, let it be useful for
> > all current uses. The 3 digits extra are very cheap useful
> > information in that area (without resorting to more elaborate
> > methods like the recently merged latency tracer).
> >
> > Rather than cut 3 digits off, maybe fix some of the too-wide prints
> > would solve the posters issue better.
> >
> > Can we please have this patch non-committed or reverted?
>
> I have no objection...

ok, i've zapped it from tip/core/printk.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-06 20:27    [W:0.037 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site