Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:57:32 -0400 (EDT) | From | Daniel Barkalow <> | Subject | Re: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems |
| |
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between > > > > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very > > > > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes > > > > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there is > > > > (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's box. > > > > > > I guess so, yes. > > > > > > On the other hand, this might also be viewed as regression (we made > > > Daniel's hardware behave worse with recent kernel than it did before), so > > > I think we still would like to have this fixed. What about the patch > > > below, adding the match on System's product name, as you suggested? > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > I agree. Daniel, could you please try the patch to make sure it > > restores the previous behavior for you and I will push it through. > > > > Thanks! > > I'll test that Thursday as well; is there some quick way to determine > whether you're using active mux or not?
That patch, on top of 2.6.25.10 does give me 4 AUX ports, so I think it is getting the previous behavior as expected.
-Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*
| |