lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Lenovo 3000 N100 i8042 problems
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:50:35PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > >
> > > > I guess we could use System's product name to differentiate between
> > > > Cristopher's and Daniel's boards. Although I must admit it is the very
> > > > first time when I see a box that behaves better with active mux. DOes
> > > > Vista use active mux nowadays? Because if it is not then I bet there is
> > > > (or shortly will be) a BIOS update fixing legacy mode on Daniel's box.
> > >
> > > I guess so, yes.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, this might also be viewed as regression (we made
> > > Daniel's hardware behave worse with recent kernel than it did before), so
> > > I think we still would like to have this fixed. What about the patch
> > > below, adding the match on System's product name, as you suggested?
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> >
> > I agree. Daniel, could you please try the patch to make sure it
> > restores the previous behavior for you and I will push it through.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> I'll test that Thursday as well; is there some quick way to determine
> whether you're using active mux or not?

That patch, on top of 2.6.25.10 does give me 4 AUX ports, so I think it is
getting the previous behavior as expected.

-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-05 01:59    [W:0.111 / U:1.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site