lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for September 3
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:31:01 -0700
> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
>> >> are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches
>> >> floating around between Eric/Al?
>> >
>> > yup, it's yesterday's mainline.
>>
>> Does the problem happen if you disable selinux?
>>
>> This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous.
>
> yeah, adding `selinux=0' to the boot command line fixes it.

The proc generic directory back structure is the same. As requested by
the selinux folks. So I don't expect there is much more we can do on
the /proc side.

When we get the interaction bug between the VFS and /proc/net fixed I wonder
if there will be some more selinux fall out. Something to think about.

Eric


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-04 23:17    [W:0.534 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site