Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] utrace core | From | Petr Tesarik <> | Date | Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:03:14 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 14:46 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:08:54AM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Why does it depend on MODULES? > > > > Because otherwise it's not adding anything new anyone can use. > > It doesn't add anything new to use either way > > > > Does this mean that when ptrace is switched to using the utrace engines, > > > non-modular kernels will have to lack ptrace(2)? > > > > No. If that were done, then it would be: > > depends on MODULE || PTRACE > > or suchlike. > > > > > Is there anything in the code that actually breaks without > > > CONFIG_MODULES? > > > > No. > > In which case you should just remove this bogus (non-)dependency.
+1
Petr Tesarik
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |