Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:07:14 -0700 | From | "Martin Bligh" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer |
| |
>> that's even worse i think :-/ And this isnt bikeshed-painting really, >> the RNGBF_ name hurts my eyes and RB_ is definitely confusing to read. >> (as the rbtree constants are in capitals as well and similarly named) >> >> RING_TYPE_PADDING >> >> or: >> >> RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING >> >> yes, it's longer, but still, saner. > > I don't mind the extra typing, it is just a bit more difficult to keep in > the 80 character line limit.
Would using tb_ (trace buffer) rather than rb_ help ?
| |