Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- Chris Snook
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- Jiri Kosina
- Karsten Keil
- "Jesse Brandeburg"
- Karsten Keil
- James Courtier-Dutton
| | | Date | Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:04:46 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) | From | "Brandeburg, Jesse" <> | Subject | Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status |
| |
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
> Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: > > hardware affected: > > laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are machines > > with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors. > > The machines I know of that have reported the issue include > > Lenovo X300 > > HP 2510p > > Intel DP35JO > > Lenovo T61 (possibly) > > Lenovo X61 (possibly) > > My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just > as some of the affected systems. Is there some reason why ICH10 is not > susceptible, or have we simply not seen it?
ICH10R with 82567 is also susceptible, as far as I know at this point.
| |