[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 00/04] RFC: Staging tree (drivers/staging)
    On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:39:42 -0400 Parag Warudkar wrote:

    > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Greg KH <> wrote:
    > > So, does this all look good to everyone? Any questions/issues?
    > >
    > I sure hope this does not end up like EXPERIMENTAL although it
    > essentially does duplicate the intent of EXPERIMENTAL.
    > (In other words - drivers live there for ever in staging mode, we
    > print warnings and generally nobody cares about the problem since the
    > kernel is tainted.)
    > That aside please at least substitute the word CRAP with something
    > TAINT_EXPERIMENTAL could also be used for known broken
    > CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL items. It might also be better to change the
    > staging directory name to non-production or experimental - but that's
    > just my preference.
    > Also, I suppose it would be useful for Production machines to have a
    > kernel command line flag or something to say don't load staging
    > modules - for instance to prevent against automatic loading on drivers
    > from staging directory to support some oddball device etc.
    > Thinking more about it - could this whole thing not be achieved by
    > setting per module experimental flag and refusing to insmod'ing
    > experimental modules if -f was not specified. I believe force loading
    > also taints the kernel? All drivers intended for staging can set that
    > flag - this way we don't need another TAINT flag and there is no need
    > for the directory name hack.

    Thanks. I agree with Parag's comments.

    Looks like overkill/duplication.


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-25 03:07    [W:0.024 / U:18.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site