lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: NFS regression? Odd delays and lockups accessing an NFS export.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 08:59 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I've found that the problem was backported into the stable stream since
> I cannot reproduce the issue with 2.6.26 but I can with 2.6.26.5. This
> is quite useful since there are only 3 relevant looking changesets in
> that range. I will bisect between these before confirming the culprit on
> mainline.

It reports:

daedfbe2a67628a40076a6c75fb945c60f608a2e is first bad commit
commit daedfbe2a67628a40076a6c75fb945c60f608a2e
Author: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Date: Wed Jun 11 17:39:04 2008 -0400

NFS: Ensure we zap only the access and acl caches when setting new acls

commit f41f741838480aeaa3a189cff6e210503cf9c42d upstream

...and ensure that we obey the NFS_INO_INVALID_ACL flag when retrieving the
acls.

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

I'm just about to build f41f741838480aeaa3a189cff6e210503cf9c42d and the
one before and try those.

I'm not using ACLs as far as I am aware.

Ian.

--
Ian Campbell

If we were meant to get up early, God would have created us with alarm clocks.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-23 13:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans