Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:10:49 +0200 | From | Olaf Dabrunz <> | Subject | Re: Unified tracing buffer |
| |
On 19-Sep-08, Martin Bligh wrote: > >> Sorry, probably lots of implicit assumptions in there that I forgot to explain > > > > Ids for event types. Either allocated dynamically, if the tracer needs > > new ids on each use, or statically assigned for others (like my fctrace > > or Steven's ftrace, I believe). Should we have a reserved range / registry > > for static allocation, maybe something like a very simple version of > > devices.txt? > > Sure, but it's per-tracer, so hopefully won't be a big problem (eg fctrace > would have a different event-id namespace from blktrace)
Ah, that is right. We can distinguish them.
-- Olaf Dabrunz (od/odabrunz), SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nürnberg
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |