[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59

    On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > Yeah, I know. One of the oddballs is the USB->PS2 keyboard emulator
    > which is active during early boot. We do the USB handoff definitely
    > after the TSC calibration. Found a box with similar (not that bad)
    > hickups which go away when I disable that in the BIOS settings.
    > Can't say anything about the laptop in that regard, because the BIOS
    > does not offer me a switch for that :(


    We actually _used_ to do this fairly early for UHCI, since it was simple
    and very useful to do, and not doing it caused serious problems with the
    USB stack.

    But then it got moved to the USB stack itself, and for some reason the
    (probably because the USB layer expected things to be fairly set up),
    which means that it now happens much much later.

    But I guess even DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER was is too late for TSC, so it
    doesn't much matter. Even with the old setup, it would be too late.

    You're definitely right that this could easily be the _real_ problem.
    Especially as your TSC min value of 2160 is (a) pretty close to the
    expected time of a microsecond and (b) so stable that I actually do not
    believe that the PIT itself is at all emulated or the problem.

    Btw - as to caring about the average value: that's pointless. If you only
    look at the average time the PIT read takes place, then it is going to
    approximate that "pit_count" thing in the end that I already did.

    Why? Because the average value should essentially end up being "(end_tsc -
    start_tsc) / pit_count". And if you just compare that to "min_tsc", then
    that should always be about a microsecond (on normal machines where the
    PIT is essentially on the old emulated internal "ISA" bus on the
    southbridge). So you end up with what I already posted, and you already

    So average TSC is not any more interesting than "pit_count".


     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-02 20:47    [W:0.022 / U:4.820 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site