Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:29:01 -0700 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: [patch] mm: tiny-shmem fix lor, mmap_sem vs i_mutex |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > in 7 days that's about 7000 random bootups, 20% of which had TINY_SHMEM > enabled, half 32-bit, half 64-bit x86. It did not blow up in any way > that would have prevented the kernel from building its next random > version from within itself and it did not produce any kernel messages > with various random kernel debug, compile and boot options. >
Does anything in that workload actually use shared memory?
J
| |