lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: x86_{phys,virt}_bits field also for i386 (v3)

    * Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:

    > >>> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 18.09.08 13:20 >>>
    > >
    > >* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
    > >
    > >> * Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > I'm really sorry for that, yet another merge oversight (not caught
    > >> > because only re-tested on x86-64). Here's a better one.
    > >>
    > >> ah, i see, the delta below. Nasty.
    > >
    > >the attached config fails in a similar way.
    >
    > Hmm, yes, other than in .27, -tip derives resource_size_t from phys_addr_t,
    > regardless of CONFIG_RESOURCES_64BIT (and the config you provided
    > is a non-PAE one). I have to question that change, which I'm sure is
    > responsible for this failure. If there's a good reason for this, then
    > phys_addr_valid() should use phys_addr_t as its parameter type (and
    > so should ioremap() & Co), and the pre-processor conditional should
    > then change to depend on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. Since ioremap()
    > would need to change first, I'd have to withdraw the patch until that
    > gets sorted out.

    (Cc:-ing Jeremy and Hugh).

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-18 14:33    [W:0.021 / U:35.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site