[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Laptop shock detection and harddisk protection
Pavel Machek <> wrote:
> Hi!
>> Short of a satisfying proposition regarding the questions raised, I just
>> want to add two things that would be nice to solve in the future one way
>> or another and should perhaps be taken into consideration from the
>> beginning:
>> 1. Disable polling completely when it isn't required: once the hd has
>> spun down, there is no need to keep polling the sensors at all. Only
>> when the first request requiring the hd to spin up arrives, the
>> kernel needs to hold back for a short while to gather enough data
>> from the sensors, so shock protection is up and running again.
> hdparm can already tell if disk is spinning or not. As userland is
> polling, already, that may be enough?

Yes, I know it *is* possible, I just think it may not be completely
trivial to get it right. The only way I can think of, right now, is some
sort of polling in the hdparm way, i.e. issuing a ATA_CMD_CHK_POWER from
time to time. The question is how we are to decide when and how often we
should poll for the current power state of the HD.

>> 2. Make shock protection interact nicely with suspend operations:
>> currently, we are out of luck if anything should happen after
>> processes have been frozen. This is particularly unfortunatel in the
>> case of s2disk.
> I'd say that s2disk is similar to early boot... no protection there.

Well, this is true for resume. However, I can't help thinking that we
may do better than that until the disk spins down, particularly while
writing the image to disk.



 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-17 17:23    [W:0.091 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site