Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:58:21 +0530 | From | "karthikeyan S" <> | Subject | Re: A bug (probably) in stop_all_threads |
| |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:19:58AM +0530, karthikeyan S wrote: >> Hi Willy, >> >> Thanks for getting back. Yes, I tried to set the state to >> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE. It solves the issue. The other processes now get a >> chance to handle the SIGSTOP sent to them. > > OK, that will help me review the current code and compare it with 2.6. > If you could send me your patch, it will even save me more time. Based > on your report, it's very likely that it will get merged.
Sure, I can definitely send the patch. I haven't sent a patch before, and I am not fully aware of the process to follow. It might take a little bit if time, but I will try to send it very soon.
-karthik > > Thanks, > Willy > >
| |