lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:01:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> It's technically overkill, if (and only if!) these instructions don't
>> actually touch the SSE state (most likely they're using the SSE
>> pipeline, and need this stuff to deal with power management issues.)
>
> Yes the PadLock uses the SSE pipeline, but doesn't touch any
> of the state.

And yet it requires all the settings that goes along with holding the
SSE state. Really crap design, unfortunately.

>> However, overkill is a good way to make sure something is dead.
>> Applying the patch will make sure we fix the regression, and we can
>> worry about optimizing this further post-2.6.27.
>
> Do we really need the FPU changes right now? I'd prefer for that
> to be backed out until a proper solution is found. Disabling
> preemption around crypto is really bad for scheduling latency.

I hate to say it, but given the relative marketshare, we should disable
Padlock instead.

This is part of the pain of being a minority architecture.

-hpa



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-09 04:07    [W:0.170 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site