lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Make PFN_PHYS return a properly-formed physical address
    Andrew Morton wrote:
    > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:45:12 -0700
    > Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
    >
    >
    >> Shall we go with just using plain u64 (or unsigned long long if we want
    >> a really consistent type) in the meantime, and then waffle about
    >> introducing a new type everywhere?
    >>
    >> Or we could redefine resource_size_t to be big enough to refer to any
    >> resource, including all memory. It's close to being that anyway.
    >>
    >
    > We could do
    >
    > typedef resource_size_t jeremy_thing_t;
    >
    > for now and worry about it later if the need arises, perhaps.
    >

    OK, I'll revise and repost.

    Hm, curiously, the two arches which care most about this issue (x86 and
    powerpc) already have phys_addr_t...

    I guess we don't want CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_PHYS_ADDR_T...

    J


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-08 02:19    [W:0.025 / U:31.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site