[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH]Fix broken VMI in 2.6.27-rc..

On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The only way I can see around that, though, is to move the 1:1 mapping base up
> by 2/4 MB (for PAE/no PAE, respectively) and put the fixmap area there. Kind
> of sucks, but would be doable.

So if the address isn't fixed, you'll end up with an indirect pointer, and
it would likely be much better to just use a fixed direct pointer that is
not at the top.

And anything that is within the top 31 bits of the address space should
generate the same good code, since the fixed offset is always going to be
a 32-bit thing anyway. So moving the FIXMAP area down by 4MB sounds like a
fine thing to do with no real downside, if it then means that we don't
need to move the FIXMAP area at all.

Hmm? Am I missing something?


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-08 00:41    [W:0.145 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site