[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Patch 0/2] Renaming 'trace' to 'relay' and enhancements to 'relay'
    Andrew Morton <> writes:

    > [...]
    >> Please find the patches that enhance the 'trace' infrastructure
    >> (available in the -mm tree) and which introduce two new APIs
    >> relay_dump() and relay_printk().
    >> [...]

    > I'm a bit perplexed by these trace patches
    > ( [...]
    > Is it useful? Will it be useful? [...] I haven't heard much noise
    > about it and I'm struggling to justify merging it.


    > Also, it's starting to look somewhat similar to ftrace, which also
    > provides sort of high-bandwidth per-cpu channels into userspace for
    > tracing purposes.

    Perhaps ftrace ought to use this facility for its debugfs-facing bulk
    data interface rather than an internal one that cannot be used by
    anyone else. Perhaps lttng could use it. Systemtap could. I believe
    a grand unification at this level was the idea.

    - FChE

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-06 17:17    [W:0.028 / U:50.380 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site