lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scanning
From
Date
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote on 06/08/2008 12:10:58:

> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 19:44, tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com wrote:
> > Nick Piggin wrote on 05/08/2008 19:08:05:
> > > On Tuesday 05 August 2008 07:00, Eric Paris wrote:
> > > > 5. Define which filesystems are cacheable and which are not
> > >
> > > This is practically impossible to do completely without rewriting a
lot
> > > of code (which will never be accepted). I don't see why it is needed
> >
> > though
> >
> > > as the filesystem cache is supposed to be kept coherent with disk.
> >
> > Problem is with network filesystems. So could it be a flag somewhere
per
> > filesystem which would say something like "this filesystem guarantees
> > content of a file cannot change without get_write_access or
> > file_update_time being called locally"? That doesn't sound like a lot
of
> > code so what am I missing?
>
> Maybe... but that's not the same as what requirement 5 calls for.

I see what you mean, it should have been worded better. Nevertheless that
is what was intended by it - to enable caching only on filesystems where
it is safe to do so.

> But depending on exactly what semantics you really call for, it can get
> tricky to account for all of pagecache. Writes can happen through page
> tables or get_user_pages. True that a process has to at some point have
> write permission to the file, but the cache itself could be modified
> even after the file is closed and all mmaps disappear.

I don't have a very good understanding of the VM subsystem I must admit.
So in other words with the current kernel file modification time is not
necessarily correct - it represents when the file was last opened for
modification, not when it was actually modified? (While those two points
in time can be arbitrarily separated)

How would I use those methods for file modification? I am curious to make
a test case..

Tvrtko


Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon,
OX14 3YP, United Kingdom.

Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-06 13:37    [W:0.082 / U:14.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site