lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] SLUB: detach SLUB_DEBUG and SYSFS
    Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    > On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:10:37PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
    >> Christoph Lameter wrote:
    >>> Pekka Enberg wrote:
    >>>> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
    >>>>> Right now, SYSFS=n means no SLUB debugging, no even basic poisoning,
    >>>>> to hell with tunables.
    >>>> Applied, thanks!
    >>> Do not apply. This partially reverts an earlier commit and would cause
    >>> build
    >>> issues because the #ifdef parts in slub.c were not reverted.
    >> Aww, crap. OK, taking it out.
    >
    > OK, I'll test-compile it to death.

    Not sure what the point would be. If you look at the commit you are reverting
    then its clear what configurations will break,

    > For now, do you agree that SYSFS=n users shouldn't be discriminated
    > against poisoning?

    If you want a minimal memory footprint then I thought that also implies that
    the debug code would not be compiled in?

    > As real world situation, NET_NS feature which is currently in
    > active development doesn't work with SYSFS, so it was a bit of cold
    > shower to realise that I did much testing of conntracking in netns
    > without poisoning. :-(

    Ohh.. There are kernel features that conflict with SYSFS?





    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-08-05 16:37    [W:2.489 / U:0.064 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site