[lkml]   [2008]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 2/4] Configure out file locking features
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:52:37PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> Le Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:38:48 -0400,
>> "J. Bruce Fields" <> a écrit :
>>> Out of curiosity, why does the nfs client need disabling, but not
>>> nfsd, gfs2, fuse, etc.?
>> Then also need disabling.
> OK by me, but again, why exactly? Since you're replacing the locking
> calls they used by stubs that just return errors, in theory nfs, nfsd,
> gfs2, and the rest should still compile and run, just without locking
> support, right?

I think so, but haven't tested this myself.

However, I would still be inclined to NOT add the extra config
dependencies. Just my 2 cents.
-- Tim

Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2008-08-04 20:25    [W:0.094 / U:10.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site